Articles and Chapters

Forthcoming
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Group Belief Reconceived’, forthcoming in Synthese.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Online Illusions of Understanding’, forthcoming in Social Epistemology.​
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Three Models of ‘Collective Virtue’’, in: Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, and Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology. London: Routledge, forthcoming 2022.

Published
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘How to Trust a Scientist’​, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 93 (2022): 11-20. (doi open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘What’s So Bad About Misinformation?’ Inquiry online first (doi open access). 
  • Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘The Point of Political Belief’, in: Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. London: Routledge, 2021, 145-166.
  • Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘General Introduction’, in: Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. London: Routledge, 2021, 1–7.
  • Catarina Dutilh Novaes & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Is Fake News Old News?’, in: Sven Bernecker, Amy Flowerree, and Thomas Grundmann (eds.), The Epistemology of Fake News. New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2021, 156–179.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Deep Disagreement and Political Polarization’, in: Michael Hannon & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Political Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021, 226-243.
  • Chris Ranalli & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Common Sense and Ontological Commitment’, in: Rik Peels & René van Woudenberg (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Common Sense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, 287–309.
  • Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg, ‘Introduction: Science and Common Sense’, in: Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense London: Routledge, 2020, 1–19.
  • Jeroen de Ridder. 2019. ‘Algorithm-Based Illusions of Understanding.’ Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8.10 (2019): 53–64. (doi open access)
  • Rik Peels, René van Woudenberg, Jeroen de Ridder, and Lex Bouter, ‘Academia’s Big Five: a normative taxonomy for the epistemic responsibilities of universities’, F1000Research 8 (2019): 862. (doi open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Against Quasi-Fideism’, Faith and Philosophy 36.2 (2019): 223–243.
  • Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, Tamarinde Haven, and Lex Bouter, ‘Value Pluralism in Research Integrity’, Research Integrity and Peer Review 4:18 (2019). (open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge?’, in: Kevin McCain & Kostas Kampourakis (eds.), What is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. London: Routledge, 2019, 3–17.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Representations and Robustly Collective Attitudes’, in: J. Adam Carter, Orestis Palermos, Duncan Pritchard, and Andy Clark (eds.), Socially Extended Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 36–58 (pdf)
  • Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘The Unassertability of Contextualism’, Questiones Disputatae 8.2 (2018): 68–86.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Kinds of Knowledge: Limits of Science’, in: Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, 190–219.
  • René van Woudenberg, Jeroen de Ridder, & Rik Peels, ‘Scientism: An Introduction’, in: Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, 1–27.
  • Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Introduction to the Philosophy of Creation Order, with Special Emphasis on the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd’, in: Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Future of Creation Order Volume 1: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives on Order and Emergence. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018, 1–30.
  • Gijsbert van den Brink, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg, ‘The Epistemic Status of Evolutionary Theory’, Theology and Science 15.4 (2017): 454–472. (doi open access)
  • René van Woudenberg & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Design Hypotheses Behave Like Skeptical Hypotheses or: Why We Cannot Know the Falsity of Design Hypotheses’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7.2 (2017): 69–90. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Why Only Externalists Can Be Steadfast’, Erkenntnis 79.1 (2014): 185–99. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Epistemic Dependence and Collective Scientific Knowledge’, Synthese 191.1 (2014): 37–53. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3.12 (2014): 23–39. (pdf | doi open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder & René van Woudenberg, ‘Worshipping, Believing in, and Referring to the Same God’, Faith & Philosophy 31.1 (2014): 46–67. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Introduction’ & ‘Design Discourse and the Cognitive Science of Design’, Philosophia Reformata 79.1 (2014): 3–7 & 37–53. (pdf 1 & pdf 2 | doi 1 & doi 2)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Is There Epistemic Justification for Secrecy in Science?’, Episteme 10.2 (2013): 101–16. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder & Mathanja Berger, ‘Shipwrecked or Holding Water? In Defense of Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Believer’, Philo 16.1 (2013): 42–61 . (pdf | doi)​
  • Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Unsafe Assertions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90.4 (2012): 797–801. (pdf | doi)​
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘Religious Exclusivism Unlimited’, Religious Studies 47.4 (2011): 449–463. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘Mechanistic Artefact Explanation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37.1 (2006): 81–96. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘The Alleged Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations.’ Technè 10.1 (2006): 97–116. (pdf | doi)

Edited Volumes

  • Mark Alfano, Colin Klein, and Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), Social Virtue Epistemology. London: Routledge, forthcoming 2022.
  • Michael Hannon & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. London: Routledge, 2021.
  • Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense. London: Routledge, 2020.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  • Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Future of Creation Order Vol. I: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives on Order and Emergence. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018.

Work in Progress

Get in touch for drafts
  • ‘Individual intellectual virtues, collective civic vices’
  • ‘Beyond Social Knowledge’
  • ‘Second-Hand Disagreements’

Replies

  • Jeroen de Ridder. “Against Empirical-ish Philosophy: Reply to Mizrahi.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8.12 (2019): 8-12. (doi open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, “So What if ‘Fake News’ is Fake News?” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8.10 (2019): 111–113. (doi open access)

Book Reviews

  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Richard N. Williams & Daniel Robinson (eds.), Scientism: The New Orthodoxy’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30.1 (2017): 93–95. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Laura Frances Callahan & Timothy O’Connor (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue’, Journal of Analytic Theology 4 (2016): 409–15. (pdf | doi open access)
  • ‘Epistemology Socialized: Review of Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard (eds): Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.’ Metascience 21.2 (2012): 477–81. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Willem B. Drees, Religion and Science in Context: A Guide to the Debates’, Philosophia Reformata 76.1 (2011): 154–57. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley, Knowledge of God’, Philosophia Reformata 75.1 (2010): 88–90.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Bradley Monton, Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design’, Philosophia Reformata 75.1 (2010): 85–88. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume I’, Philosophia Reformata 74.2 (2009): 158–61. (pdf | doi)