Jeroen de Ridder
  • Home
  • Research
    • Vidi Project
    • Epistemic Responsibilities of the University
    • Science Beyond Scientism
    • Veni Project
  • Publications
  • In Dutch
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Contact

Articles and Chapters

Forthcoming
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Against Quasi-Fideism’, Faith and Philosophy.
  • Chris Ranalli & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Common Sense and Ontological Commitment’, in: Rik Peels & René van Woudenberg (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Common Sense (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).
  • Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg, ‘Introduction: Science and Common Sense’, in: Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense (London: Routledge, forthcoming).
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Deep Disagreement and Political Polarization’, in: Michael Hannon & Elizabeth Edenberg (eds.), Political Epistemology (publisher tbd).
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge?’, in: Kevin McCain & Kostas Kampourakis (eds.), What is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. London: Routledge, 2019.
Published
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Representations and Robustly Collective Attitudes’, in: J. Adam Carter, Orestis Palermos, Duncan Pritchard, and Andy Clark (eds.), Socially Extended Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 36–58 (pdf)
  • Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘The Unassertability of Contextualism’, Questiones Disputatae 8.2 (2018): 68–86.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Kinds of Knowledge: Limits of Science’, in: Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, 190–219.
  • René van Woudenberg, Jeroen de Ridder, & Rik Peels, ‘Scientism: An Introduction’, in: Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, 1–27.
  • Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Introduction to the Philosophy of Creation Order, with Special Emphasis on the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd’, in: Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Future of Creation Order Volume 1: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives on Order and Emergence. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018, 1–30.
  • Gijsbert van den Brink, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg, ‘The Epistemic Status of Evolutionary Theory’, Theology and Science 15.4 (2017): 454–472. (doi open access)
  • René van Woudenberg & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Design Hypotheses Behave Like Skeptical Hypotheses or: Why We Cannot Know the Falsity of Design Hypotheses’, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7.2 (2017): 69–90. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Why Only Externalists Can Be Steadfast’, Erkenntnis 79.1 (2014): 185–99. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Epistemic Dependence and Collective Scientific Knowledge’, Synthese 191.1 (2014): 37–53. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing’, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3.12 (2014): 23–39. (pdf | doi open access)
  • Jeroen de Ridder & René van Woudenberg, ‘Worshipping, Believing in, and Referring to the Same God’, Faith & Philosophy 31.1 (2014): 46–67. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Introduction’ & ‘Design Discourse and the Cognitive Science of Design’, Philosophia Reformata 79.1 (2014): 3–7 & 37–53. (pdf 1 & pdf 2 | doi 1 & doi 2)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Is There Epistemic Justification for Secrecy in Science?’, Episteme 10.2 (2013): 101–16. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder & Mathanja Berger, ‘Shipwrecked or Holding Water? In Defense of Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Believer’, Philo 16.1 (2013): 42–61 . (pdf | doi)​
  • Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Unsafe Assertions’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90.4 (2012): 797–801. (pdf | doi)​
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘Religious Exclusivism Unlimited’, Religious Studies 47.4 (2011): 449–463. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘Mechanistic Artefact Explanation’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37.1 (2006): 81–96. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder,‘The Alleged Inherent Normativity of Technological Explanations.’ Technè 10.1 (2006): 97–116. (pdf | doi)

Edited Volumes

  • Rik Peels, Jeroen de Ridder, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense. London: Routledge. (under contract)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gerrit Glas & Jeroen de Ridder (eds.), The Future of Creation Order Vol. I: Philosophical, Scientific, and Religious Perspectives on Order and Emergence. Dordrecht: Springer.

Work in Progress

Get in touch for drafts
  • ‘Don’t Trust a Scientist’
  • ‘Fake News Epistemology’
  • ‘Group Belief Reconceived’​
  • ‘Beyond Social Knowledge’
  • ‘Second-Hand Disagreements’
  • ‘Algorithm-Based Illusions of Understanding’
  • ‘Value Pluralism in Research Integrity’ (with Rik Peels, Tamarinde Haven, and Lex Bouter)
  • ‘The Argument from Scale’ (with Rik Peels)

Book Reviews

  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Richard N. Williams & Daniel Robinson (eds.), Scientism: The New Orthodoxy’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30.1 (2017): 93–95. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Laura Frances Callahan & Timothy O’Connor (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue’, Journal of Analytic Theology 4 (2016): 409–15. (pdf | doi open access)
  • ‘Epistemology Socialized: Review of Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard (eds): Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.’ Metascience 21.2 (2012): 477–81. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Willem B. Drees, Religion and Science in Context: A Guide to the Debates’, Philosophia Reformata 76.1 (2011): 154–57. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley, Knowledge of God’, Philosophia Reformata 75.1 (2010): 88–90.
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Bradley Monton, Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design’, Philosophia Reformata 75.1 (2010): 85–88. (pdf | doi)
  • Jeroen de Ridder, ‘Review of Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume I’, Philosophia Reformata 74.2 (2009): 158–61. (pdf | doi)
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Research
    • Vidi Project
    • Epistemic Responsibilities of the University
    • Science Beyond Scientism
    • Veni Project
  • Publications
  • In Dutch
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Contact